Katie / 21 / Seattle / too many fandoms to name / Totally not Jongdae biased

1 234


beatlesweatles:

rartedarchived:

image
image

?????????

Humans be mixing milk and rice

nodogsonmoon:

marquisoforder:

“this character is not canonically bisexual” to YOU. i know them personally

how dare you hide this in the tags

image

dogrotpdf:

girlie you can’t give up now you don’t have the dark green couch of your dreams yet

geopsych:

image

I still have so many photos from Sunday. Gently spamming you with a few.

happykjd:

angel with the cutest laugh 🤧

j-k-i-ng:

“Untitled“ by | Marcel Siebert
Hohenzollern, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

toebeanz:

lost-son-of-rome:

It’s your problem now, fuckers.

image

New state dropped my dudes

serialreblogger:

literaryreference:

undeadwill:

friendly-neighborhood-patriarch:

theinturnetexplorer:

the crows are his allies now.

“THE DEBT MUST BE REPAID. YOU HAVE OUR ALLEGIANCE, HUMAN”

@theclockworkscarecrow

That’s actually how it works.

Crows: smart enough to not only remember but convey to their buddies which humans were nice to them that one time and which were jerks, but dumb enough to get their heads stuck in fences, apparently.

AREN’T WE ALL

computersloth:

I’m blowing u a kiss it should arrive in 3-5 business days

fatfemmearoorc:

capsgirl19:

cundtcake:

image

Botanical Sexism Cultivates Home-Grown Allergies 

Arborists often claim that all-male plants are “litter-free” because they shed no messy seeds, fruits or pods. In the 1949 USDA Yearbook of Agriculture, which focused on trees and forests, this advice was given to readers: “When used for street plantings, only male trees should be selected, to avoid the nuisance from the seed.”  In the years following, the USDA produced and released into the market almost 100 new red maple and hybrid-maple-named clones (cultivars), and every single one of them was male.

It took a number of years for these new trees to mature enough to start to bloom, but eventually they did and with them came more city pollen and the “epidemic of allergy and asthma.” Many of these same trees are still alive and well and getting even larger, and the bigger they get, the more pollen they shed.

Allergies are rarely triggered by small amounts of an allergen; they are initiated by an overdose. Small amounts of pollen exposure are actually good for us, but if we have highly allergenic trees or shrubs in our own yards or lining our streets, we will soon enough be over-exposed. In order to put the brakes on America’s allergy epidemic, we need to reverse the trend toward male-dominated landscapes and stop selling and planting any more of the most allergenic trees, shrubs and grasses in our cities.

and the kicker:

Female trees produce no pollen, but they trap and remove large amounts of pollen from the air, and turn it into seed. Female trees (and female shrubs also) are not just passive, but are active allergy-fighting trees. The more female plants in a landscape, the less pollen there will be in the air in the immediate vicinity. By relying less on males and paying more attention to the allergy-potential of all the plants in our urban landscape, all of us may one day breathe easier.

ain’t this what happened to the fuckin ents

caps youre the funniest fucking person alive

tygermama:

if a hand kiss isn’t done with either reverent trembling and closed eyes or with a certain slow sensuality and direct ‘fuck me’ eye contact, you are wasting my time and everyone else’s